<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<!--<href>banner.jpg</href>-->
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<title-group>
<article-title>A Complete Distributed Constraint Optimization Method For <br/>Non-Traditional Pseudotree Arrangements</article-title>
</title-group>

<author><a href="mailto:atlas@cis.udel.edu"><name>James Atlas</name></a></author>
<aff>Computer and Information Sciences <br/>University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716</aff>

<author><a href="mailto:decker@cis.udel.edu"><name>Keith Decker</name></a></author>
<aff>Computer and Information Sciences <br/>University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716</aff>
</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>Distributed Constraint Optimization (DCOP) is a general framework
that can model complex problems in multi-agent systems.
Several current algorithms that solve general DCOP instances, including
ADOPT and DPOP, arrange agents into a traditional pseudotree
structure. We introduce an extension to the DPOP algorithm
that handles an extended set of pseudotree arrangements. Our algorithm
correctly solves DCOP instances for pseudotrees that include
edges between nodes in separate branches. The algorithm
also solves instances with traditional pseudotree arrangements using
the same procedure as DPOP.</p>
<p>We compare our algorithm with DPOP using several metrics including
the induced width of the pseudotrees, the maximum dimensionality
of messages and computation, and the maximum sequential
path cost through the algorithm. We prove that for some problem
instances it is not possible to generate a traditional pseudotree
using edge-traversal heuristics that will outperform a cross-edged
pseudotree. We use multiple heuristics to generate pseudotrees and
choose the best pseudotree in linear space-time complexity. For
some problem instances we observe significant improvements in
message and computation sizes compared to DPOP.</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>AAMAS07_0220_f71ff862eafea6f5dccc8cbcdecb9759</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>

