<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<!--<href>banner.jpg</href>-->
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<title-group>
<article-title>A Formal Road from Institutional Norms to Organizational Structures</article-title>
</title-group>

<author><a href="mailto:davide@cs.uu.nl"><name>Davide Grossi</name></a></author>
<aff>Utrecht University, PO Box 80.089, 3508TB Utrecht, The Netherlands</aff>

<author><a href="mailto:dignum@cs.uu.nl"><name>Frank Dignum</name></a></author>
<aff>Utrecht University, PO Box 80.089, 3508TB Utrecht, The Netherlands</aff>

<author><a href="mailto:jj@cs.uu.nl"><name>John-Jules Ch. Meyer</name></a></author>
<aff>Utrecht University, PO Box 80.089, 3508TB Utrecht, The Netherlands</aff>

</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>Up to now, the way institutions and organizations have been used in
the development of open systems has not often gone further than a
useful heuristics. In order to develop systems actually implementing
institutions and organizations, formal methods should take the
place of heuristic ones. The paper presents a formal semantics for
the notion of institution and its components (abstract and concrete
norms, empowerment of agents, roles) and defines a formal relation
between institutions and organizational structures. As a result,
it is shown how institutional norms can be refined to constructs&#8211;organizational structures&#8211;which are closer to an implemented system.
It is also shown how such a refinement process can be fully
formalized and it is therefore amenable to rigorous verification.</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>AAMAS07_0331_7fe120e805c9fe1278969cbda195b8c5</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>

