<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<!--<href>banner.jpg</href>-->
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<title-group>
<article-title>Organizational SelfDesign in Semidynamic Environments</article-title>
</title-group>

<author><a href="mailto:kamboj@cis.udel.edu"><name>Sachin Kamboj</name></a></author>
<aff>Department of Computer and Information Sciences <br/>University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716</aff>

<author><a href="mailto:decker@cis.udel.edu"><name>Keith S. Decker</name></a></author>
<aff>Department of Computer and Information Sciences<br/> University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716</aff>

</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>Organizations are an important basis for coordination in multiagent
systems. However, there is no best way to organize and all
ways of organizing are not equally effective. Attempting to optimize
an organizational structure depends strongly on environmental
features including problem characteristics, available resources,
and agent capabilities. If the environment is dynamic, the environmental
conditions or the problem task structure may change over
time. This precludes the use of static, design-time generated, organizational
structures in such systems. On the other hand, for many
real environments, the problems are not totally unique either: certain
characteristics and conditions change slowly, if at all, and these
can have an important effect in creating stable organizational structures.</p>
<p>Organizational-Self Design (OSD) has been proposed as an approach
for constructing suitable organizational structures at runtime.
We extend the existing OSD approach to include worthoriented
domains, model other resources in addition to only processor
resources and build in robustness into the organization. We
then evaluate our approach against the contract-net approach and
show that our OSD agents perform better, are more efficient, and
more flexible to changes in the environment.</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>AAMAS07_0417_fb585e5451e48a13c0ec84cf1a5f08e9</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>

