<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<!--<href>banner.jpg</href>-->
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<title-group>
<article-title>A Unified and General Framework for Argumentation-based Negotiation</article-title>
</title-group>

<author><a href="mailto:amgoud@irit.fr"><name>Leila Amgoud</name></a></author>
<aff>IRIT &#8211; CNRS 118, route de Narbonne 31062, Toulouse, France</aff>

<author><a href="mailto:yannis@cs.ucy.ac.cy"><name>Yannis Dimopoulos</name></a></author>
<aff>University of Cyprus 75 Kallipoleos Str. PO Box 20537, Cyprus</aff>

<author><a href="mailto:pavlos@math-info.univparis5.fr"><name>Pavlos Moraitis</name></a></author>
<aff>Paris-Descartes University 45 rue des Saints-P&#232;res 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France</aff>

</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>This paper proposes a <italic>unified</italic> and <italic>general</italic> framework for
argumentation-based negotiation, in which the role of argumentation
is formally analyzed. The framework makes it
possible to study the outcomes of an argumentation-based
negotiation. It shows what an <italic>agreement</italic> is, how it is related
to the theories of the agents, when it is possible, and how
this can be attained by the negotiating agents in this case.
It defines also the notion of <italic>concession</italic>, and shows in which
situation an agent will make one, as well as how it influences
the evolution of the dialogue.</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>AAMAS07_0452_4a40ba2b8a7a2b0784bfe79f2142fe30</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>

